Author: John Burton
The extreme crisis in the social care system is not just financial. There are long-standing and increasing problems in the quality of the support it provides. Whilst cuts and cost pressures increase, the Care Quality Commission (CQC) is expected to ensure that people are protected from abuse. However this system does not work and, as it's currently organised, cannot work.
In this important paper John Burton argues that CQC is failing in one of its primary responsibilities, to ensure the quality of registered care homes. There are many reason why CQC cannot - as it is currently organised - be effective:
There is an important role for the regulation of social care and there are real risks in leaving people unprotected in institutional environments, but an effective system would:
As CQC has come to dominate the landscape of health and social care few organisations will risk challenging its obvious failings. It is seen as too important to fail and too powerful to cross. Hopefully this paper will encourage others to be brave enough to state publicly what they'll admit in private.
Read and download the free pdf in your browser here.
The publisher is the Centre for Welfare Reform.
What's Wrong with CQC? © John Burton 2017.
All Rights Reserved. No part of this paper may be reproduced in any form without permission from the publisher except for the quotation of brief passages in reviews.
John Burton describes how the institutional assumptions of the care system undermine the creativity and community that is possible when people live together.
John Burton describes how changes in the regulatory regime are forcing the closure of genuinely human homes where people live together as friends.
An Open Letter to David Behan (Head of Regulation) and Norman Lamb (lead politician) on the danger of relying on regulation to keep people safe.
Sam Sly shares her enthusiasm for the creation of a National Association of Quality Checkers.
Bob Rhodes and Richard Davis explore the damaging impact that regulatory systems can have on intentional communities.