Menu

Research:

Welfare conditionality causes more harm than good

The Welfare Conditionality project (WelCond), led by the University of York and involving the Universities of Glasgow, Sheffield, Salford, Sheffield Hallam and Heriot-Watt, analysed the effectiveness, impact and ethics of welfare conditionality from 2013-2018. 

The findings are based on repeat longitudinal interviews undertaken with 339 people in England and Scotland and drawn from nine policy areas, including Universal Credit, disabled people, migrants, lone parents, offenders and homeless people.

Key findings include:

  • Little evidence welfare conditionality enhanced people’s motivation to prepare for or enter paid work
  • Some people pushed into destitution, survival crime and ill health
  • Benefit sanctions routinely triggered profoundly negative personal, financial and health outcomes
  • The mandatory training and support is often too generic, of poor quality and largely ineffective in enabling people to enter and sustain paid work

The authors of the report say it is time for a “comprehensive review” of the use of welfare conditionality.

WelCond Director Professor Peter Dwyer, from the University of York’s Department of Social Policy and Social Work, said: 

“Our review reveals that in the majority of cases welfare conditionality doesn’t work as intended and we have evidence it has increased poverty and pushed some people into survival crime.

“What also became apparent was people were focusing on meeting the conditions of their benefit claim and that became their job – it is totally counter-productive.

“You are just making people do things to meet the conditions of the claim rather than getting them into work.

“Successive governments have used welfare conditionality and the ‘carrot and stick’ it implies to promote positive behaviour change.

“Our review has shown it is out of kilter, with the idea of sanctioning people to the fore. It is more stick, very little carrot and much of the support is ineffective.”

Other key recommendations include:

  • Reduce the severity of sanctions
  • Job search support and employment and skills training need to be significantly improved
  • The wider application of welfare conditionality within the benefit system for disabled people, homeless people and other vulnerable people, such as those with drug or alcohol dependency, should be paused

Dr Simon Duffy, Director of the Centre for Welfare Reform said:

"For over 20 years, particularly in the USA and the UK, policy-makers have been promoting 'conditionality' in the benefit system as if it were a reasonable and well-founded policy. In fact this policy is just code for unjustified sanctions, increased bureaucracy and growing levels of poverty and harm. These policies have nothing to do with human rights nor the principles of justice. Instead they are the result of prejudice and ideology and serve to shift the blame for wider social problems on to the backs of disabled people and people in poverty. The Centre welcomes this important report which, in a sane world, would bring to an end these unfounded and harmful policies."  

Read the full series of findings at:

http://www.welfareconditionality.ac.uk/publications/final-findings-welcond-project/